Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The Arctic and Global Warming

Recently, Jeff posted this article as a comment on my last global warming post. I thought it was a pretty good article, but I wasn't sure if any of you would look at old comments, so I decided just to post it. I haven't looked any of the information up to see how reliable it is, but I know the dating of the earth is off. I don't know how much other evolutionary bias is on this article, but it is nice to see that not all evolutionists believe everything the EPA says.
~~~
Alaska's Polar Bears: Going With The FloeBy INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILYJune 16, 2008 4:20 PM PTEnergy:

The green light given by the Fish and Wildlife Service for oil drilling off Alaska is being portrayed as an OK to hurt polar bears. But there are so many polar bears, it's the drillers who should worry.

Environmentalists rejoiced last month when Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne declared the polar bear endangered. The designation gave them a poster pet for the dangers of global warming and a club to bludgeon oil companies.

Last week, however, there was a break in the ice, so to speak. New Fish and Wildlife regulations gave legal protection to seven oil companies that plan to search for oil in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska's northwest coast if "small numbers" of polar bears and Pacific walruses are incidentally harmed over the next five years.

The Associated Press went ballistic, proclaiming that less than a month after the polar bear was listed as endangered, "the Bush administration is giving oil companies permission to annoy and potentially harm them in the pursuit of oil and natural gas."

What the administration is doing is honoring contracts signed in February, before the polar bear was listed — wrongly, we believe — as endangered. Fact is, polar bears aren't endangered, either by oil companies or climate change.

When he made the listing, Kempthorne noted that exploration in the Chukchi Sea was exempt. "Polar bears are already protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act," he explained, "which has more stringent protections for polar bears than the Endangered Species Act does."

Listing the polar bear as endangered was a political decision made under political pressure.

The Mineral Management Service estimates we could recover 15 billion barrels of oil plus 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas from the Chukchi Sea's 29.7 million acres. Oil companies enjoyed a similar exclusion in the Chukchi from 1991 to 1996 and in the Beaufort Sea since 1993 with no effect on the bears.

In fact, there's no proof of a single bear being harmed by oil operations in Alaska since 1993. Since 1960, when the Alaska oil hunt began, only two oil-related bear fatalities have been documented.

The world polar bear population is at a modern high and growing. Mitch Taylor, polar bear biologist with the Government of Nunavut, a territory in Canada, puts the current population at 24,000, up 40% since 1974. Some 2,000 of these bears live in and around the Chukchi Sea, where the oil companies purchased leases worth $2.6 billion in February.

Taylor says that, contrary to greenie hype, climate change, particularly in the Arctic, is not pushing them to the brink of extinction. They have and will continue to adapt to their environment.The ice-loving bears have survived warmer periods than we are experiencing now. The most recent such period occurred 6,000 and 9,000 years ago, and it was even warmer between 110,000 and 130,000 years ago, long before the first SUV hit the road.

In a report to Fish and Wildlife, Taylor stated: "No evidence exists that suggests that both bears and the conservation systems that regulate them will not adapt and respond to the new conditions." Taylor stressed polar bears' adaptability, saying they evolved from grizzlies 250,000 years ago and as a distinct species about 125,000 years ago when natural climate change occurred.

From caribou that have thrived for 30 years as 15 billion barrels have been pumped from Prudhoe Bay in Alaska to marine life thriving among drilling platforms that act like artificial reefs off the Louisiana coast, evidence says oil exploration and the environment can coexist. Katrina ravaged Gulf of Mexico oil facilities and not a single drop of oil was leaked or spilled.

Oil companies are criticized for not using their "obscene" profits to find more oil but then attacked when they want to. Lift the polar bear's endangered status. Drill in the Chukchi. Drill now.

13 comments:

Dr. Russell Norman Murray said...

Very good article, Abbey.

Listing the polar bear as endangered was a political decision made under political pressure.

Surprise, surprise.

Taylor says that, contrary to greenie hype, climate change, particularly in the Arctic, is not pushing them to the brink of extinction. They have and will continue to adapt to their environment.The ice-loving bears have survived warmer periods than we are experiencing now.

Interesting. The global warming issue to me is full of contrasting information, and your posted article just adds to my thoughts in that direction.

Russ:)

Dr. Russell Norman Murray said...

Another thought:

You could photoshop the polar bear photo and put yourself in it.
You could state that because of global warming they have moved near you and so you are selling them as pets to finance your way through college.

Russ;)

Abbey said...

^LOL! Nice idea! Unfortunately, I don't think it would go over well enough to pay my way through college. :D

Thanks, Jeff, for finding the article.

Abbey said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dr. Russell Norman Murray said...

I am not trying to 'rip you off' or copy you, but someone sent me polar bear pictures and so I used one.;)

Anonymous said...

But global warming is real! It's the stupid human race that's causing it. There should not be any oil drilling in the arctic. We don't need to burn off more oil into our atmosphere.

Jeff said...

Thanks for the mention, Abbey.

I have been reading that nuclear power is far less polluting than oil, and does not present the danger which we have assumed it does, for the past 50 years.

All this reminds me of the myths of ozone depletion, including such things as spray cans, when, in fact, spray cans (in the United States) have not used CFCs as propellants for about 20 years.

Jeff said...

Read this:
The Myths of Global Warming

Jeff said...

Articles on Global Warming

Jeff said...

Global Warming Hysteria

Jeff said...

Global Warming: A Convenient Lie
from the Centre for Research on Globalization

Jeff said...

Global Warming: The Myth, The Hype and The Facts
an excerpt:
"I have been in operational meteorology since 1978, and I know dozens and dozens of broadcast meteorologists all over the country. Our big job: look at a large volume of raw data and come up with a public weather forecast for the next seven days. I do not know of a single TV meteorologist who buys into the man-made global warming hype. I know there must be a few out there, but I can’t find them. Here are the basic facts you need to know: Billions of dollars of grant money is flowing into the pockets of those on the man-made global warming bandwagon. No man-made global warming, the money dries up. This is big money, make no mistake about it. Nothing wrong with making money at all, but when money becomes the motivation for a scientific conclusion, then we have a problem. For many, global warming is a big cash grab. The climate of this planet has been changing since God put the planet here. It will always change, and the warming in the last 10 years is not much difference than the warming we saw in the 1930s and other decades. And, lets not forget we are at the end of the ice age in which ice covered most of North America and Northern Europe." (ABC-TV Alabama affiliate weatherman James Spann)

DEEPAK COMPUTERS said...

thanks for reading my blog..i m from india ..in ur comment u said that u can not get the hindee so i can also write in english